Framer vs Lunacy — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Framer si: Les designers qui veulent publier de vrais sites web directement depuis leur outil de design sans toucher au code
Choisissez Lunacy si: Les designers au budget serré qui veulent une alternative à Sketch qui tourne sur n'importe quel OS — totalement gratuit
Notre avis: Both are solid. Framer edges it for most people.
| Framer | Lunacy | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free plan (Framer subdomain) | Mini $5/mo | Completely free |
| Fonctionnalités | Design-to-website publishing, Responsive breakpoints, CMS and dynamic content, Motion animations, Component variants | Sketch file compatibility, Built-in design assets, AI image generation, Vector editing tools, Works on Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Idéal pour | Designers who want to ship real websites directly from their design tool without touching code | Designers on a budget who want a Sketch alternative that runs on any OS — completely free |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Moyen |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Framer stands out with Design-to-website publishing and Responsive breakpoints. Lunacy counters with Sketch file compatibility and Built-in design assets.
Framer's Achilles heel: it’s a website builder disguised as a design tool — complex web apps are out of scope entirely. Lunacy's: smaller community means fewer plugins and tutorials — you’re often on your own for troubleshooting. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value design-to-website publishing and les designers qui veulent, go with Framer. If les designers au budget matters more, Lunacy is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.