Framer vs InVision — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Framer si: Les designers qui veulent publier de vrais sites web directement depuis leur outil de design sans toucher au code
Choisissez InVision si: Les équipes qui ont besoin de prototypage léger et de whiteboarding en complément de leurs outils design existants
Notre avis: Framer for simplicity, InVision for power users.
| Framer | InVision | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free plan (Framer subdomain) | Mini $5/mo | Free plan with 3 documents | Pro $7.95/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Design-to-website publishing, Responsive breakpoints, CMS and dynamic content, Motion animations, Component variants | Freehand whiteboard, Prototyping and animations, Design system manager, Inspect for developer handoff, Presentation mode |
| Idéal pour | Designers who want to ship real websites directly from their design tool without touching code | Teams that need lightweight prototyping and whiteboarding alongside existing design tools |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Facile |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Framer stands out with Design-to-website publishing and Responsive breakpoints. InVision counters with Freehand whiteboard and Prototyping and animations.
Framer's Achilles heel: it’s a website builder disguised as a design tool — complex web apps are out of scope entirely. InVision's: shut down its core studio product — effectively pivoted to freehand only. most teams have moved to figma. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value design-to-website publishing and les designers qui veulent, go with Framer. If les équipes qui ont matters more, InVision is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.