Figma vs InVision — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Figma si: Les équipes design qui ont besoin de collaboration en temps réel et d'un handoff développeur sans accroc
Choisissez InVision si: Les équipes qui ont besoin de prototypage léger et de whiteboarding en complément de leurs outils design existants
Notre avis: Figma for simplicity, InVision for power users.
| Figma | InVision | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free for up to 3 projects | Professional $12/editor/mo | Free plan with 3 documents | Pro $7.95/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Real-time collaboration, Auto Layout, Component variants and variables, Dev mode for handoff, FigJam whiteboard | Freehand whiteboard, Prototyping and animations, Design system manager, Inspect for developer handoff, Presentation mode |
| Idéal pour | Design teams that need real-time collaboration and seamless developer handoff | Teams that need lightweight prototyping and whiteboarding alongside existing design tools |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Facile |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Figma stands out with Real-time collaboration and Auto Layout. InVision counters with Freehand whiteboard and Prototyping and animations.
Figma's Achilles heel: requires internet connection — offline mode is limited and the desktop app is basically a browser wrapper. InVision's: shut down its core studio product — effectively pivoted to freehand only. most teams have moved to figma. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value real-time collaboration and les équipes design qui, go with Figma. If les équipes qui ont matters more, InVision is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.