Capacities vs Tana — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Capacities si: Les penseurs visuels qui veulent la flexibilité de Notion avec un système de connaissances plus personnel et orienté objets
Choisissez Tana si: Les power users qui veulent construire leur propre système d'exploitation personnel avec des notes structurées et interrogeables
Notre avis: Capacities for simplicity, Tana for power users.
| Capacities | Tana | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free for personal use | Pro $9.99/mo | Free for personal use | Tana Pro $10/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Object-based note system, Daily notes and journals, Media management, Tag-based organization, Graph view of connections | Supertag-based schema system, Live search nodes, Command node automations, AI integration built-in, Outliner with structured data |
| Idéal pour | Visual thinkers who want Notion’s flexibility with a more personal, object-oriented knowledge system | Power users who want to build their own personal operating system with structured, queryable notes |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Difficile |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Capacities stands out with Object-based note system and Daily notes and journals. Tana counters with Supertag-based schema system and Live search nodes.
Capacities's Achilles heel: young product with missing features — no api, limited integrations, and collaboration is early-stage. Tana's: steep learning cliff — the supertag concept is powerful but takes days to grok properly. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value object-based note system and les penseurs visuels qui, go with Capacities. If les power users qui matters more, Tana is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.