Capacities vs Roam Research — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Capacities si: Les penseurs visuels qui veulent la flexibilité de Notion avec un système de connaissances plus personnel et orienté objets
Choisissez Roam Research si: Les chercheurs et écrivains qui pensent en idées connectées et veulent du linking au niveau des blocs
Notre avis: Capacities for simplicity, Roam Research for power users.
| Capacities | Roam Research | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free for personal use | Pro $9.99/mo | No free plan | Pro $15/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Object-based note system, Daily notes and journals, Media management, Tag-based organization, Graph view of connections | Bidirectional linking, Block-level references, Daily notes workflow, Graph overview, Custom CSS and JavaScript |
| Idéal pour | Visual thinkers who want Notion’s flexibility with a more personal, object-oriented knowledge system | Researchers and writers who think in connected ideas and want block-level linking |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Difficile |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Capacities stands out with Object-based note system and Media management. Roam Research counters with Bidirectional linking and Block-level references.
Capacities's Achilles heel: young product with missing features — no api, limited integrations, and collaboration is early-stage. Roam Research's: no free plan, web-only (no native desktop), and the community has shrunk as obsidian and logseq grew. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value object-based note system and les penseurs visuels qui, go with Capacities. If les chercheurs et écrivains matters more, Roam Research is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.