Basecamp vs Shortcut — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Basecamp si: Les équipes remote qui privilégient la simplicité et la communication async plutôt que la gestion granulaire des tâches
Choisissez Shortcut si: Les équipes software qui ont dépassé Trello mais trouvent Jira étouffant — le sweet spot pour 10-100 ingénieurs
Notre avis: Basecamp is easier to pick up, but Shortcut is more powerful long-term.
| Basecamp | Shortcut | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | No free plan (30-day trial) | Basecamp $15/user/mo | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Message boards, To-do lists, Schedules and check-ins, File storage, Hill charts for progress tracking | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams |
| Idéal pour | Remote teams that value simplicity and async communication over granular task management | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Facile | Moyen |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Basecamp stands out with Message boards and To-do lists. Shortcut counters with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations.
Basecamp's Achilles heel: no gantt charts, no time tracking, no custom fields — intentionally opinionated but limiting for complex work. Shortcut's: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value message boards and les équipes remote qui, go with Basecamp. If les équipes software qui matters more, Shortcut is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.