Asana vs Shortcut — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Asana si: Les équipes de taille moyenne qui ont besoin de workflows projet structurés sans la complexité développeur
Choisissez Shortcut si: Les équipes software qui ont dépassé Trello mais trouvent Jira étouffant — le sweet spot pour 10-100 ingénieurs
Notre avis: Asana for simplicity, Shortcut for power users.
| Asana | Shortcut | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free for up to 10 users | Starter $10.99/user/mo | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Timeline and Gantt views, Workflow automation, Custom fields and forms, Portfolio tracking, 200+ integrations | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams |
| Idéal pour | Mid-size teams that need structured project workflows without developer complexity | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Moyen |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Asana stands out with Workflow automation and Custom fields and forms. Shortcut counters with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations.
Asana's Achilles heel: free plan is barebones — you hit paywall fast on reporting and automation. Shortcut's: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value workflow automation and les équipes de taille, go with Asana. If les équipes software qui matters more, Shortcut is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.