Asana vs Linear — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Asana si: Les équipes de taille moyenne qui ont besoin de workflows projet structurés sans la complexité développeur
Choisissez Linear si: Les équipes d'ingénierie qui veulent le tracker d'issues le plus rapide et le plus tranché du marché
Notre avis: Asana for simplicity, Linear for power users.
| Asana | Linear | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free for up to 10 users | Starter $10.99/user/mo | Free for up to 250 issues | Standard $8/user/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Timeline and Gantt views, Workflow automation, Custom fields and forms, Portfolio tracking, 200+ integrations | Keyboard-first navigation, Cycles and roadmaps, Git and PR integrations, Triage and auto-assignment, Sub-issues and relations |
| Idéal pour | Mid-size teams that need structured project workflows without developer complexity | Engineering teams that want the fastest, most opinionated issue tracker on the market |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Facile |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Asana stands out with Timeline and Gantt views and Workflow automation. Linear counters with Keyboard-first navigation and Cycles and roadmaps.
Asana's Achilles heel: free plan is barebones — you hit paywall fast on reporting and automation. Linear's: built for devs by devs — non-technical teams will feel alienated by the workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value timeline and gantt views and les équipes de taille, go with Asana. If les équipes d'ingénierie qui matters more, Linear is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.