Asana vs Height — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Asana si: Les équipes de taille moyenne qui ont besoin de workflows projet structurés sans la complexité développeur
Choisissez Height si: Les équipes produit et ingénierie qui veulent l'AI intégrée dans chaque action de projet — pas collée par-dessus
Notre avis: Asana for simplicity, Height for power users.
| Asana | Height | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free for up to 10 users | Starter $10.99/user/mo | Free for unlimited members with basic features | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Timeline and Gantt views, Workflow automation, Custom fields and forms, Portfolio tracking, 200+ integrations | AI-powered task creation and prioritization, Cross-team project views with filtering, Built-in spreadsheet-like attributes, Smart task suggestions from chat and docs, Real-time collaboration with offline support |
| Idéal pour | Mid-size teams that need structured project workflows without developer complexity | Product and engineering teams that want AI baked into every project action — not bolted on |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Moyen | Moyen |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Asana stands out with Timeline and Gantt views and Workflow automation. Height counters with AI-powered task creation and prioritization and Cross-team project views with filtering.
Asana's Achilles heel: free plan is barebones — you hit paywall fast on reporting and automation. Height's: young product with a smaller ecosystem — integrations and templates lag behind asana and linear. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value timeline and gantt views and les équipes de taille, go with Asana. If les équipes produit et matters more, Height is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.