Around vs Loom — Lequel l'emporte ?
Choisissez Around si: Les équipes design et produit qui utilisent déjà Miro et veulent des appels vidéo légers sans quitter leur workspace
Choisissez Loom si: Les équipes remote qui veulent remplacer les réunions inutiles par des messages vidéo asynchrones rapides
Notre avis: Around for simplicity, Loom for power users.
| Around | Loom | |
|---|---|---|
| Tarifs | Free (now part of Miro) | Included with Miro paid plans | Free for 25 videos (5 min each) | Business $15/user/mo |
| Fonctionnalités | Floating circle video bubbles, Auto noise cancellation, Low bandwidth optimization, Screen sharing, Miro whiteboard integration | Async video messaging, Screen + webcam recording, AI transcription and summaries, Viewer engagement analytics, Comments and reactions on videos |
| Idéal pour | Design and product teams already using Miro who want lightweight video calls without leaving their workspace | Remote teams that want to replace unnecessary meetings with quick async video messages |
| Courbe d'apprentissage | Facile | Facile |
La vraie différence
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Around stands out with Floating circle video bubbles and Auto noise cancellation. Loom counters with Async video messaging and AI transcription and summaries.
Around's Achilles heel: absorbed into miro — standalone product identity is fading, and you’re locked into miro’s ecosystem now. Loom's: not a real-time meeting tool — it’s async only, so you still need zoom or meet for live calls. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Le verdict
If you value floating circle video bubbles and les équipes design et, go with Around. If les équipes remote qui matters more, Loom is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.