Shortcut vs Teamwork — ¿Cuál gana?
Elige Shortcut si: Equipos de software que superaron Trello pero encuentran Jira asfixiante — el punto ideal para 10-100 ingenieros
Elige Teamwork si: Agencias y equipos de servicio al cliente que necesitan seguimiento de horas facturables integrado en la gestión de proyectos
Nuestra opinión: Shortcut for simplicity, Teamwork for power users.
| Shortcut | Teamwork | |
|---|---|---|
| Precios | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free for up to 5 users | Deliver $13.99/user/mo |
| Funciones | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams | Client-facing project views, Time tracking and billing, Workload and profitability reporting, Task dependencies and milestones, Built-in chat |
| Ideal para | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers | Agencies and client services teams that need billable time tracking baked into project management |
| Curva de aprendizaje | Intermedio | Intermedio |
La verdadera diferencia
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Shortcut stands out with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations. Teamwork counters with Client-facing project views and Workload and profitability reporting.
Shortcut's Achilles heel: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Teamwork's: the interface feels enterprise-heavy for small teams — too many menus for simple projects. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusión
If you value kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and equipos de software que, go with Shortcut. If agencias y equipos de matters more, Teamwork is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.