Loom vs Microsoft Teams — ¿Cuál gana?
Elige Loom si: Equipos remotos que quieren reemplazar reuniones innecesarias con mensajes de video asincrónicos rápidos
Elige Microsoft Teams si: Organizaciones Microsoft 365 que quieren chat, video y colaboración de archivos unificados en una plataforma
Nuestra opinión: Loom is easier to pick up, but Microsoft Teams is more powerful long-term.
| Loom | Microsoft Teams | |
|---|---|---|
| Precios | Free for 25 videos (5 min each) | Business $15/user/mo | Free with 60-minute meetings (100 participants) | Microsoft 365 Business Basic $6/user/mo |
| Funciones | Async video messaging, Screen + webcam recording, AI transcription and summaries, Viewer engagement analytics, Comments and reactions on videos | Chat, channels, and video in one app, Screen sharing and whiteboard, Meeting recordings and transcription, Copilot AI assistant, SharePoint and OneDrive integration |
| Ideal para | Remote teams that want to replace unnecessary meetings with quick async video messages | Microsoft 365 organizations that want chat, video, and file collaboration unified in one platform |
| Curva de aprendizaje | Fácil | Intermedio |
La verdadera diferencia
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Loom stands out with Async video messaging and Viewer engagement analytics. Microsoft Teams counters with Chat, channels, and video in one app and Meeting recordings and transcription.
Loom's Achilles heel: not a real-time meeting tool — it’s async only, so you still need zoom or meet for live calls. Microsoft Teams's: bloated and resource-hungry — the app eats ram for breakfast and the ui is a maze of nested menus. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusión
If you value async video messaging and equipos remotos que quieren, go with Loom. If organizaciones microsoft 365 que matters more, Microsoft Teams is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.