InVision vs Webflow — ¿Cuál gana?
Elige InVision si: Equipos que necesitan prototipado ligero y pizarra junto a sus herramientas de diseño existentes
Elige Webflow si: Diseñadores que quieren construir sitios web de producción sin desarrolladores — y realmente shipear código limpio
Nuestra opinión: InVision is easier to pick up, but Webflow is more powerful long-term.
| InVision | Webflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Precios | Free plan with 3 documents | Pro $7.95/mo | Free with webflow.io subdomain and 2 pages | Basic $14/mo |
| Funciones | Freehand whiteboard, Prototyping and animations, Design system manager, Inspect for developer handoff, Presentation mode | Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control, Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content, Responsive design without writing media queries, Native hosting with global CDN and SSL, Interactions and animations with zero JavaScript |
| Ideal para | Teams that need lightweight prototyping and whiteboarding alongside existing design tools | Designers who want to build production websites without developers — and actually ship clean code |
| Curva de aprendizaje | Fácil | Difícil |
La verdadera diferencia
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
InVision stands out with Freehand whiteboard and Prototyping and animations. Webflow counters with Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control and Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content.
InVision's Achilles heel: shut down its core studio product — effectively pivoted to freehand only. most teams have moved to figma. Webflow's: steep learning curve if you do not understand css concepts — it is visual but not simple. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusión
If you value freehand whiteboard and equipos que necesitan prototipado, go with InVision. If diseñadores que quieren construir matters more, Webflow is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.