Greenhouse vs Gusto — ¿Cuál gana?
Elige Greenhouse si: Empresas en expansión que quieren procesos de contratación estructurados y sin sesgos con analytics serios y compliance
Elige Gusto si: Pequeñas empresas en USA que quieren nómina, beneficios y RRHH juntos con declaración de impuestos ultra simple
Nuestra opinión: Greenhouse for simplicity, Gusto for power users.
| Greenhouse | Gusto | |
|---|---|---|
| Precios | Essential custom pricing | Simple $40/mo + $6/person/mo |
| Funciones | Structured hiring methodology, Interview kits and scorecards, DE&I tracking and analytics, Onboarding module, 500+ integrations | Full-service payroll, Benefits administration, Automated tax filing, Onboarding workflows, Time tracking and PTO |
| Ideal para | Scaling companies that want structured, bias-reduced hiring processes with serious analytics and compliance | US small businesses that want payroll, benefits, and HR bundled together with dead-simple tax filing |
| Curva de aprendizaje | Intermedio | Fácil |
La verdadera diferencia
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Greenhouse stands out with Structured hiring methodology and Interview kits and scorecards. Gusto counters with Full-service payroll and Benefits administration.
Greenhouse's Achilles heel: enterprise pricing with zero transparency — expect $6,000–15,000+/year depending on headcount. Gusto's: us-only — no international payroll, and the per-person pricing gets expensive as your headcount grows. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusión
If you value structured hiring methodology and empresas en expansión que, go with Greenhouse. If pequeñas empresas en usa matters more, Gusto is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.