Framer vs Penpot — ¿Cuál gana?
Elige Framer si: Diseñadores que quieren publicar sitios web reales directamente desde su herramienta de diseño sin tocar código
Elige Penpot si: Defensores del open-source que quieren una alternativa a Figma auto-hospedada sin vendor lock-in
Nuestra opinión: Framer for simplicity, Penpot for power users.
| Framer | Penpot | |
|---|---|---|
| Precios | Free plan (Framer subdomain) | Mini $5/mo | Free and open source | Penpot Cloud Teams custom pricing |
| Funciones | Design-to-website publishing, Responsive breakpoints, CMS and dynamic content, Motion animations, Component variants | Open source and self-hostable, SVG-native design, Real-time collaboration, Components and design systems, Interactive prototyping |
| Ideal para | Designers who want to ship real websites directly from their design tool without touching code | Open-source advocates who want a self-hosted Figma alternative with no vendor lock-in |
| Curva de aprendizaje | Intermedio | Intermedio |
La verdadera diferencia
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Framer stands out with Design-to-website publishing and Responsive breakpoints. Penpot counters with Open source and self-hostable and SVG-native design.
Framer's Achilles heel: it’s a website builder disguised as a design tool — complex web apps are out of scope entirely. Penpot's: still catching up to figma on polish and plugin ecosystem — feels rough around the edges. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusión
If you value design-to-website publishing and diseñadores que quieren publicar, go with Framer. If defensores del open-source que matters more, Penpot is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.