Figma vs Webflow — ¿Cuál gana?
Elige Figma si: Equipos de diseño que necesitan colaboración en tiempo real y entrega fluida a desarrolladores
Elige Webflow si: Diseñadores que quieren construir sitios web de producción sin desarrolladores — y realmente shipear código limpio
Nuestra opinión: Figma for simplicity, Webflow for power users.
| Figma | Webflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Precios | Free for up to 3 projects | Professional $12/editor/mo | Free with webflow.io subdomain and 2 pages | Basic $14/mo |
| Funciones | Real-time collaboration, Auto Layout, Component variants and variables, Dev mode for handoff, FigJam whiteboard | Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control, Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content, Responsive design without writing media queries, Native hosting with global CDN and SSL, Interactions and animations with zero JavaScript |
| Ideal para | Design teams that need real-time collaboration and seamless developer handoff | Designers who want to build production websites without developers — and actually ship clean code |
| Curva de aprendizaje | Intermedio | Difícil |
La verdadera diferencia
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Figma stands out with Real-time collaboration and Auto Layout. Webflow counters with Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control and Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content.
Figma's Achilles heel: requires internet connection — offline mode is limited and the desktop app is basically a browser wrapper. Webflow's: steep learning curve if you do not understand css concepts — it is visual but not simple. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusión
If you value real-time collaboration and equipos de diseño que, go with Figma. If diseñadores que quieren construir matters more, Webflow is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.