Figma vs InVision — ¿Cuál gana?
Elige Figma si: Equipos de diseño que necesitan colaboración en tiempo real y entrega fluida a desarrolladores
Elige InVision si: Equipos que necesitan prototipado ligero y pizarra junto a sus herramientas de diseño existentes
Nuestra opinión: Figma for simplicity, InVision for power users.
| Figma | InVision | |
|---|---|---|
| Precios | Free for up to 3 projects | Professional $12/editor/mo | Free plan with 3 documents | Pro $7.95/mo |
| Funciones | Real-time collaboration, Auto Layout, Component variants and variables, Dev mode for handoff, FigJam whiteboard | Freehand whiteboard, Prototyping and animations, Design system manager, Inspect for developer handoff, Presentation mode |
| Ideal para | Design teams that need real-time collaboration and seamless developer handoff | Teams that need lightweight prototyping and whiteboarding alongside existing design tools |
| Curva de aprendizaje | Intermedio | Fácil |
La verdadera diferencia
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Figma stands out with Real-time collaboration and Auto Layout. InVision counters with Freehand whiteboard and Prototyping and animations.
Figma's Achilles heel: requires internet connection — offline mode is limited and the desktop app is basically a browser wrapper. InVision's: shut down its core studio product — effectively pivoted to freehand only. most teams have moved to figma. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusión
If you value real-time collaboration and equipos de diseño que, go with Figma. If equipos que necesitan prototipado matters more, InVision is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.