Figma vs Framer — ¿Cuál gana?
Elige Figma si: Equipos de diseño que necesitan colaboración en tiempo real y entrega fluida a desarrolladores
Elige Framer si: Diseñadores que quieren publicar sitios web reales directamente desde su herramienta de diseño sin tocar código
Nuestra opinión: Figma for simplicity, Framer for power users.
| Figma | Framer | |
|---|---|---|
| Precios | Free for up to 3 projects | Professional $12/editor/mo | Free plan (Framer subdomain) | Mini $5/mo |
| Funciones | Real-time collaboration, Auto Layout, Component variants and variables, Dev mode for handoff, FigJam whiteboard | Design-to-website publishing, Responsive breakpoints, CMS and dynamic content, Motion animations, Component variants |
| Ideal para | Design teams that need real-time collaboration and seamless developer handoff | Designers who want to ship real websites directly from their design tool without touching code |
| Curva de aprendizaje | Intermedio | Intermedio |
La verdadera diferencia
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Figma stands out with Real-time collaboration and Auto Layout. Framer counters with Design-to-website publishing and Responsive breakpoints.
Figma's Achilles heel: requires internet connection — offline mode is limited and the desktop app is basically a browser wrapper. Framer's: it’s a website builder disguised as a design tool — complex web apps are out of scope entirely. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusión
If you value real-time collaboration and equipos de diseño que, go with Figma. If diseñadores que quieren publicar matters more, Framer is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.