Copper vs Keap — ¿Cuál gana?
Elige Copper si: Empresas de Google Workspace que quieren un CRM viviendo dentro de Gmail y Calendar sin cambiar de contexto
Elige Keap si: Dueños de pequeños negocios que quieren ventas, marketing y pagos unificados en una plataforma
Nuestra opinión: Copper is easier to pick up, but Keap is more powerful long-term.
| Copper | Keap | |
|---|---|---|
| Precios | Starter $9/user/mo | Ignite $249/mo (2 users) |
| Funciones | Native Google Workspace integration, Automatic data entry from Gmail, Pipeline management, Workflow automations, Activity tracking | CRM + marketing automation combo, Landing pages and forms, Appointment scheduling, Invoicing and payments, Email and SMS campaigns |
| Ideal para | Google Workspace shops that want a CRM living inside Gmail and Calendar with zero context-switching | Small business owners who want sales, marketing, and payments unified in one platform |
| Curva de aprendizaje | Fácil | Difícil |
La verdadera diferencia
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Copper stands out with Native Google Workspace integration and Automatic data entry from Gmail. Keap counters with CRM + marketing automation combo and Landing pages and forms.
Copper's Achilles heel: useless outside the google ecosystem — if you use outlook or other email, look elsewhere. Keap's: eye-wateringly expensive — $249/mo starting price locks out most solopreneurs and early startups. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusión
If you value native google workspace integration and empresas de google workspace, go with Copper. If dueños de pequeños negocios matters more, Keap is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.