Close vs Copper — ¿Cuál gana?
Elige Close si: Equipos de ventas internas que viven en el teléfono y quieren llamadas integradas directamente en su CRM
Elige Copper si: Empresas de Google Workspace que quieren un CRM viviendo dentro de Gmail y Calendar sin cambiar de contexto
Nuestra opinión: Close for simplicity, Copper for power users.
| Close | Copper | |
|---|---|---|
| Precios | Startup $49/user/mo | Starter $9/user/mo |
| Funciones | Built-in calling and SMS, Email sequences, Pipeline and activity reporting, Smart Views for filtering, Predictive dialer | Native Google Workspace integration, Automatic data entry from Gmail, Pipeline management, Workflow automations, Activity tracking |
| Ideal para | Inside sales teams that live on the phone and want calling built directly into their CRM | Google Workspace shops that want a CRM living inside Gmail and Calendar with zero context-switching |
| Curva de aprendizaje | Fácil | Fácil |
La verdadera diferencia
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Close stands out with Built-in calling and SMS and Email sequences. Copper counters with Native Google Workspace integration and Automatic data entry from Gmail.
Close's Achilles heel: no free plan and expensive entry point — $49/user/mo is steep for early-stage startups. Copper's: useless outside the google ecosystem — if you use outlook or other email, look elsewhere. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusión
If you value built-in calling and sms and equipos de ventas internas, go with Close. If empresas de google workspace matters more, Copper is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.