Capacities vs Roam Research — ¿Cuál gana?
Elige Capacities si: Pensadores visuales que quieren la flexibilidad de Notion con un sistema de conocimiento personal orientado a objetos
Elige Roam Research si: Investigadores y escritores que piensan en ideas conectadas y quieren enlaces a nivel de bloque
Nuestra opinión: Capacities for simplicity, Roam Research for power users.
| Capacities | Roam Research | |
|---|---|---|
| Precios | Free for personal use | Pro $9.99/mo | No free plan | Pro $15/mo |
| Funciones | Object-based note system, Daily notes and journals, Media management, Tag-based organization, Graph view of connections | Bidirectional linking, Block-level references, Daily notes workflow, Graph overview, Custom CSS and JavaScript |
| Ideal para | Visual thinkers who want Notion’s flexibility with a more personal, object-oriented knowledge system | Researchers and writers who think in connected ideas and want block-level linking |
| Curva de aprendizaje | Intermedio | Difícil |
La verdadera diferencia
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Capacities stands out with Object-based note system and Media management. Roam Research counters with Bidirectional linking and Block-level references.
Capacities's Achilles heel: young product with missing features — no api, limited integrations, and collaboration is early-stage. Roam Research's: no free plan, web-only (no native desktop), and the community has shrunk as obsidian and logseq grew. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusión
If you value object-based note system and pensadores visuales que quieren, go with Capacities. If investigadores y escritores que matters more, Roam Research is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.