Around vs Loom — ¿Cuál gana?
Elige Around si: Equipos de diseño y producto que ya usan Miro y quieren videollamadas ligeras sin salir de su workspace
Elige Loom si: Equipos remotos que quieren reemplazar reuniones innecesarias con mensajes de video asincrónicos rápidos
Nuestra opinión: Around for simplicity, Loom for power users.
| Around | Loom | |
|---|---|---|
| Precios | Free (now part of Miro) | Included with Miro paid plans | Free for 25 videos (5 min each) | Business $15/user/mo |
| Funciones | Floating circle video bubbles, Auto noise cancellation, Low bandwidth optimization, Screen sharing, Miro whiteboard integration | Async video messaging, Screen + webcam recording, AI transcription and summaries, Viewer engagement analytics, Comments and reactions on videos |
| Ideal para | Design and product teams already using Miro who want lightweight video calls without leaving their workspace | Remote teams that want to replace unnecessary meetings with quick async video messages |
| Curva de aprendizaje | Fácil | Fácil |
La verdadera diferencia
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Around stands out with Floating circle video bubbles and Auto noise cancellation. Loom counters with Async video messaging and AI transcription and summaries.
Around's Achilles heel: absorbed into miro — standalone product identity is fading, and you’re locked into miro’s ecosystem now. Loom's: not a real-time meeting tool — it’s async only, so you still need zoom or meet for live calls. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Conclusión
If you value floating circle video bubbles and equipos de diseño y, go with Around. If equipos remotos que quieren matters more, Loom is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.