Shortcut vs Wrike — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Shortcut, wenn: Software-Teams, die aus Trello rausgewachsen sind, aber Jira erdrückend finden — der Sweet Spot für 10–100 Engineers
Wähle Wrike, wenn: Enterprise-Teams, die mehrere crossfunktionale Projekte mit hohem Reporting-Bedarf jonglieren
Unsere Einschätzung: Shortcut for simplicity, Wrike for power users.
| Shortcut | Wrike | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free for up to 5 users | Team $9.80/user/mo |
| Funktionen | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams | Gantt charts and workload view, Cross-tagging across projects, Request forms and approvals, Time tracking built-in, 400+ integrations |
| Am besten für | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers | Enterprise teams juggling multiple cross-functional projects with heavy reporting needs |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Mittel |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Shortcut stands out with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations. Wrike counters with Gantt charts and workload view and Cross-tagging across projects.
Shortcut's Achilles heel: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Wrike's: the ui feels dated and cluttered — onboarding new team members takes longer than it should. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and software-teams, die aus trello, go with Shortcut. If enterprise-teams, die mehrere crossfunktionale matters more, Wrike is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.