Shortcut vs Teamwork — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Shortcut, wenn: Software-Teams, die aus Trello rausgewachsen sind, aber Jira erdrückend finden — der Sweet Spot für 10–100 Engineers
Wähle Teamwork, wenn: Agenturen und Client-Service-Teams, die Billable Time Tracking direkt im Projektmanagement brauchen
Unsere Einschätzung: Shortcut for simplicity, Teamwork for power users.
| Shortcut | Teamwork | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free for up to 5 users | Deliver $13.99/user/mo |
| Funktionen | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams | Client-facing project views, Time tracking and billing, Workload and profitability reporting, Task dependencies and milestones, Built-in chat |
| Am besten für | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers | Agencies and client services teams that need billable time tracking baked into project management |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Mittel |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Shortcut stands out with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations. Teamwork counters with Client-facing project views and Workload and profitability reporting.
Shortcut's Achilles heel: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Teamwork's: the interface feels enterprise-heavy for small teams — too many menus for simple projects. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and software-teams, die aus trello, go with Shortcut. If agenturen und client-service-teams, die matters more, Teamwork is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.