Roam Research vs Tana — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Roam Research, wenn: Forscher und Autoren, die in vernetzten Ideen denken und Block-Level-Linking wollen
Wähle Tana, wenn: Power-User, die sich ihr eigenes persönliches Betriebssystem mit strukturierten, abfragbaren Notizen bauen wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Roam Research for simplicity, Tana for power users.
| Roam Research | Tana | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | No free plan | Pro $15/mo | Free for personal use | Tana Pro $10/mo |
| Funktionen | Bidirectional linking, Block-level references, Daily notes workflow, Graph overview, Custom CSS and JavaScript | Supertag-based schema system, Live search nodes, Command node automations, AI integration built-in, Outliner with structured data |
| Am besten für | Researchers and writers who think in connected ideas and want block-level linking | Power users who want to build their own personal operating system with structured, queryable notes |
| Lernkurve | Schwer | Schwer |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Roam Research stands out with Bidirectional linking and Block-level references. Tana counters with Supertag-based schema system and Live search nodes.
Roam Research's Achilles heel: no free plan, web-only (no native desktop), and the community has shrunk as obsidian and logseq grew. Tana's: steep learning cliff — the supertag concept is powerful but takes days to grok properly. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value bidirectional linking and forscher und autoren, die, go with Roam Research. If power-user, die sich ihr matters more, Tana is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.