Penpot vs Rive — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Penpot, wenn: Open-Source-Fans, die eine selbst-gehostete Figma-Alternative ohne Vendor-Lock-in wollen
Wähle Rive, wenn: App-Entwickler und Motion Designer, die interaktive Animationen brauchen, die in Echtzeit auf User-Input reagieren
Unsere Einschätzung: Penpot for simplicity, Rive for power users.
| Penpot | Rive | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free and open source | Penpot Cloud Teams custom pricing | Free for 3 files with community features | Creator $14/mo |
| Funktionen | Open source and self-hostable, SVG-native design, Real-time collaboration, Components and design systems, Interactive prototyping | State machine editor for interactive animations, Lightweight runtimes for iOS, Android, Web, and Flutter, Real-time collaboration on animation files, Bone-based rigging for character animation, Runtime event triggers for app logic integration |
| Am besten für | Open-source advocates who want a self-hosted Figma alternative with no vendor lock-in | App developers and motion designers who need interactive animations that respond to user input in real time |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Schwer |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Penpot stands out with Open source and self-hostable and SVG-native design. Rive counters with State machine editor for interactive animations and Lightweight runtimes for iOS, Android, Web, and Flutter.
Penpot's Achilles heel: still catching up to figma on polish and plugin ecosystem — feels rough around the edges. Rive's: the state machine concept is powerful but intimidating — non-developers will hit a wall fast. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value open source and self-hostable and open-source-fans, die eine selbst-gehostete, go with Penpot. If app-entwickler und motion designer, matters more, Rive is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.