Obsidian vs Tana — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Obsidian, wenn: Power-User und Developer, die ihre Daten besitzen und einen persönlichen Knowledge-Graphen aufbauen wollen
Wähle Tana, wenn: Power-User, die sich ihr eigenes persönliches Betriebssystem mit strukturierten, abfragbaren Notizen bauen wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Obsidian for simplicity, Tana for power users.
| Obsidian | Tana | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free for personal use | Commercial $50/user/year | Free for personal use | Tana Pro $10/mo |
| Funktionen | Local-first markdown files, Bidirectional linking, Graph view, Plugin ecosystem (1000+), Full offline support | Supertag-based schema system, Live search nodes, Command node automations, AI integration built-in, Outliner with structured data |
| Am besten für | Power users and developers who want to own their data and build a personal knowledge graph | Power users who want to build their own personal operating system with structured, queryable notes |
| Lernkurve | Schwer | Schwer |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Obsidian stands out with Local-first markdown files and Bidirectional linking. Tana counters with Supertag-based schema system and Live search nodes.
Obsidian's Achilles heel: no real-time collaboration — syncing across devices requires paid add-on or diy solution. Tana's: steep learning cliff — the supertag concept is powerful but takes days to grok properly. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value local-first markdown files and power-user und developer, die, go with Obsidian. If power-user, die sich ihr matters more, Tana is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.