Lever vs Rippling — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Lever, wenn: Mittelständler, die Recruiting-CRM mit ATS für proaktives Sourcing verbinden wollen
Wähle Rippling, wenn: Wachsende Unternehmen, die HR, IT und Gerätemanagement auf einer Plattform mit globalem Payroll wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Lever for simplicity, Rippling for power users.
| Lever | Rippling | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | LeverTRM custom pricing | Starts at $8/user/mo |
| Funktionen | ATS + CRM in one platform, Diversity and inclusion analytics, Interview scheduling and scorecards, Nurture campaigns for passive candidates, Visual pipeline management | Unified HR, IT, and finance platform, Global payroll in 50+ countries, Device management, App provisioning and SSO, Custom workflow automation |
| Am besten für | Mid-market companies that want recruiting CRM capabilities blended with ATS for proactive sourcing | Growing companies that want HR, IT, and device management unified in one platform with global payroll |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Mittel |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Lever stands out with ATS + CRM in one platform and Diversity and inclusion analytics. Rippling counters with Unified HR, IT, and finance platform and Global payroll in 50+ countries.
Lever's Achilles heel: no public pricing — you’re forced into a sales call, and it’s not cheap once you get the quote. Rippling's: modular pricing means costs stack up fast — the base is cheap but every add-on module costs extra. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value ats + crm in one platform and mittelständler, die recruiting-crm mit, go with Lever. If wachsende unternehmen, die hr, matters more, Rippling is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.