InVision vs Rive — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle InVision, wenn: Teams, die leichtgewichtiges Prototyping und Whiteboarding neben bestehenden Design-Tools brauchen
Wähle Rive, wenn: App-Entwickler und Motion Designer, die interaktive Animationen brauchen, die in Echtzeit auf User-Input reagieren
Unsere Einschätzung: InVision is easier to pick up, but Rive is more powerful long-term.
| InVision | Rive | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free plan with 3 documents | Pro $7.95/mo | Free for 3 files with community features | Creator $14/mo |
| Funktionen | Freehand whiteboard, Prototyping and animations, Design system manager, Inspect for developer handoff, Presentation mode | State machine editor for interactive animations, Lightweight runtimes for iOS, Android, Web, and Flutter, Real-time collaboration on animation files, Bone-based rigging for character animation, Runtime event triggers for app logic integration |
| Am besten für | Teams that need lightweight prototyping and whiteboarding alongside existing design tools | App developers and motion designers who need interactive animations that respond to user input in real time |
| Lernkurve | Einfach | Schwer |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
InVision stands out with Freehand whiteboard and Prototyping and animations. Rive counters with State machine editor for interactive animations and Lightweight runtimes for iOS, Android, Web, and Flutter.
InVision's Achilles heel: shut down its core studio product — effectively pivoted to freehand only. most teams have moved to figma. Rive's: the state machine concept is powerful but intimidating — non-developers will hit a wall fast. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value freehand whiteboard and teams, die leichtgewichtiges prototyping, go with InVision. If app-entwickler und motion designer, matters more, Rive is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.