Hive vs Linear — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Hive, wenn: Schnelle Teams, die einen modernen Allrounder mit eingebautem E-Mail und AI-Features wollen
Wähle Linear, wenn: Engineering-Teams, die den schnellsten und konsequentesten Issue Tracker auf dem Markt wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Hive for simplicity, Linear for power users.
| Hive | Linear | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free for up to 10 users | Teams $18/user/mo | Free for up to 250 issues | Standard $8/user/mo |
| Funktionen | Gantt, kanban, and calendar views, Native email integration, Time tracking and resourcing, AI-powered task summaries, Proofing and approvals | Keyboard-first navigation, Cycles and roadmaps, Git and PR integrations, Triage and auto-assignment, Sub-issues and relations |
| Am besten für | Fast-moving teams that want a modern all-rounder with built-in email and AI features | Engineering teams that want the fastest, most opinionated issue tracker on the market |
| Lernkurve | Einfach | Einfach |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Hive stands out with Gantt, kanban, and calendar views and Native email integration. Linear counters with Keyboard-first navigation and Cycles and roadmaps.
Hive's Achilles heel: pricing jumps hard from free to paid — $18/user/mo with no mid-tier option. Linear's: built for devs by devs — non-technical teams will feel alienated by the workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value gantt, kanban, and calendar views and schnelle teams, die einen, go with Hive. If engineering-teams, die den schnellsten matters more, Linear is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.