Height vs Trello — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Height, wenn: Produkt- und Engineering-Teams, die AI in jede Projektaktion eingebaut haben wollen — nicht nachträglich draufgeschraubt
Wähle Trello, wenn: Kleine Teams und Einzelpersonen, die in Kanban denken und null Reibung wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Height for simplicity, Trello for power users.
| Height | Trello | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free for unlimited members with basic features | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free with unlimited cards and up to 10 boards | Standard $5/user/mo |
| Funktionen | AI-powered task creation and prioritization, Cross-team project views with filtering, Built-in spreadsheet-like attributes, Smart task suggestions from chat and docs, Real-time collaboration with offline support | Kanban boards, Power-Ups (integrations), Butler automation, Card templates, Calendar and timeline views (Premium) |
| Am besten für | Product and engineering teams that want AI baked into every project action — not bolted on | Small teams and individuals who think in kanban and want zero friction |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Einfach |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Height stands out with AI-powered task creation and prioritization and Cross-team project views with filtering. Trello counters with Kanban boards and Power-Ups (integrations).
Height's Achilles heel: young product with a smaller ecosystem — integrations and templates lag behind asana and linear. Trello's: falls apart for complex projects — no native gantt, limited reporting, and boards get unwieldy past 50 cards. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value ai-powered task creation and prioritization and produkt- und engineering-teams, die, go with Height. If kleine teams und einzelpersonen, matters more, Trello is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.