Height vs Linear — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Height, wenn: Produkt- und Engineering-Teams, die AI in jede Projektaktion eingebaut haben wollen — nicht nachträglich draufgeschraubt
Wähle Linear, wenn: Engineering-Teams, die den schnellsten und konsequentesten Issue Tracker auf dem Markt wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Height for simplicity, Linear for power users.
| Height | Linear | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free for unlimited members with basic features | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free for up to 250 issues | Standard $8/user/mo |
| Funktionen | AI-powered task creation and prioritization, Cross-team project views with filtering, Built-in spreadsheet-like attributes, Smart task suggestions from chat and docs, Real-time collaboration with offline support | Keyboard-first navigation, Cycles and roadmaps, Git and PR integrations, Triage and auto-assignment, Sub-issues and relations |
| Am besten für | Product and engineering teams that want AI baked into every project action — not bolted on | Engineering teams that want the fastest, most opinionated issue tracker on the market |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Einfach |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Height stands out with AI-powered task creation and prioritization and Cross-team project views with filtering. Linear counters with Keyboard-first navigation and Cycles and roadmaps.
Height's Achilles heel: young product with a smaller ecosystem — integrations and templates lag behind asana and linear. Linear's: built for devs by devs — non-technical teams will feel alienated by the workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value ai-powered task creation and prioritization and produkt- und engineering-teams, die, go with Height. If engineering-teams, die den schnellsten matters more, Linear is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.