Google Drive vs Sync.com — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Google Drive, wenn: Alle, die schon im Google-Ökosystem sind und nahtlosen Dateispeicher mit Docs, Sheets und Gmail wollen
Wähle Sync.com, wenn: Privacy-first-Teams, die Zero-Knowledge-Encryption standardmäßig ohne Aufpreis wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Google Drive for simplicity, Sync.com for power users.
| Google Drive | Sync.com | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | 15 GB free (shared with Gmail and Photos) | Google One 100 GB $1.99/mo | 5 GB free | Teams Standard $6/user/mo (1 TB) |
| Funktionen | Deep Google Workspace integration, Real-time collaboration on Docs/Sheets/Slides, Powerful search across files, Shared drives for teams, Offline access on mobile and desktop | End-to-end encryption by default, Zero-knowledge privacy, HIPAA and GDPR compliant, File requests and sharing, Vault for archived files |
| Am besten für | Anyone already in the Google ecosystem who wants seamless file storage tied to Docs, Sheets, and Gmail | Privacy-first teams that want zero-knowledge encryption included by default with no extra cost |
| Lernkurve | Einfach | Einfach |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Google Drive stands out with Deep Google Workspace integration and Real-time collaboration on Docs/Sheets/Slides. Sync.com counters with End-to-end encryption by default and Zero-knowledge privacy.
Google Drive's Achilles heel: 15 gb shared across gmail, drive, and photos fills up fast — you’ll be paying within months of heavy use. Sync.com's: no native document editing — you have to download files, edit locally, and re-sync every time. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value deep google workspace integration and alle, die schon im, go with Google Drive. If privacy-first-teams, die zero-knowledge-encryption standardmäßig matters more, Sync.com is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.