Framer vs Webflow — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Framer, wenn: Designer, die echte Websites direkt aus ihrem Design-Tool shippen wollen — ohne Code anzufassen
Wähle Webflow, wenn: Designer, die echte Websites ohne Developer bauen und sauberen Code shippen wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Framer for simplicity, Webflow for power users.
| Framer | Webflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free plan (Framer subdomain) | Mini $5/mo | Free with webflow.io subdomain and 2 pages | Basic $14/mo |
| Funktionen | Design-to-website publishing, Responsive breakpoints, CMS and dynamic content, Motion animations, Component variants | Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control, Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content, Responsive design without writing media queries, Native hosting with global CDN and SSL, Interactions and animations with zero JavaScript |
| Am besten für | Designers who want to ship real websites directly from their design tool without touching code | Designers who want to build production websites without developers — and actually ship clean code |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Schwer |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Framer stands out with Design-to-website publishing and Motion animations. Webflow counters with Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control and Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content.
Framer's Achilles heel: it’s a website builder disguised as a design tool — complex web apps are out of scope entirely. Webflow's: steep learning curve if you do not understand css concepts — it is visual but not simple. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value design-to-website publishing and designer, die echte websites, go with Framer. If designer, die echte websites matters more, Webflow is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.