Framer vs Penpot — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Framer, wenn: Designer, die echte Websites direkt aus ihrem Design-Tool shippen wollen — ohne Code anzufassen
Wähle Penpot, wenn: Open-Source-Fans, die eine selbst-gehostete Figma-Alternative ohne Vendor-Lock-in wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Framer for simplicity, Penpot for power users.
| Framer | Penpot | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free plan (Framer subdomain) | Mini $5/mo | Free and open source | Penpot Cloud Teams custom pricing |
| Funktionen | Design-to-website publishing, Responsive breakpoints, CMS and dynamic content, Motion animations, Component variants | Open source and self-hostable, SVG-native design, Real-time collaboration, Components and design systems, Interactive prototyping |
| Am besten für | Designers who want to ship real websites directly from their design tool without touching code | Open-source advocates who want a self-hosted Figma alternative with no vendor lock-in |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Mittel |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Framer stands out with Design-to-website publishing and Responsive breakpoints. Penpot counters with Open source and self-hostable and SVG-native design.
Framer's Achilles heel: it’s a website builder disguised as a design tool — complex web apps are out of scope entirely. Penpot's: still catching up to figma on polish and plugin ecosystem — feels rough around the edges. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value design-to-website publishing and designer, die echte websites, go with Framer. If open-source-fans, die eine selbst-gehostete matters more, Penpot is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.