Framer vs InVision — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Framer, wenn: Designer, die echte Websites direkt aus ihrem Design-Tool shippen wollen — ohne Code anzufassen
Wähle InVision, wenn: Teams, die leichtgewichtiges Prototyping und Whiteboarding neben bestehenden Design-Tools brauchen
Unsere Einschätzung: Framer for simplicity, InVision for power users.
| Framer | InVision | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free plan (Framer subdomain) | Mini $5/mo | Free plan with 3 documents | Pro $7.95/mo |
| Funktionen | Design-to-website publishing, Responsive breakpoints, CMS and dynamic content, Motion animations, Component variants | Freehand whiteboard, Prototyping and animations, Design system manager, Inspect for developer handoff, Presentation mode |
| Am besten für | Designers who want to ship real websites directly from their design tool without touching code | Teams that need lightweight prototyping and whiteboarding alongside existing design tools |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Einfach |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Framer stands out with Design-to-website publishing and Responsive breakpoints. InVision counters with Freehand whiteboard and Prototyping and animations.
Framer's Achilles heel: it’s a website builder disguised as a design tool — complex web apps are out of scope entirely. InVision's: shut down its core studio product — effectively pivoted to freehand only. most teams have moved to figma. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value design-to-website publishing and designer, die echte websites, go with Framer. If teams, die leichtgewichtiges prototyping matters more, InVision is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.