Figma vs Webflow — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Figma, wenn: Design-Teams, die Echtzeit-Kollaboration und nahtlose Developer-Übergabe brauchen
Wähle Webflow, wenn: Designer, die echte Websites ohne Developer bauen und sauberen Code shippen wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Figma for simplicity, Webflow for power users.
| Figma | Webflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free for up to 3 projects | Professional $12/editor/mo | Free with webflow.io subdomain and 2 pages | Basic $14/mo |
| Funktionen | Real-time collaboration, Auto Layout, Component variants and variables, Dev mode for handoff, FigJam whiteboard | Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control, Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content, Responsive design without writing media queries, Native hosting with global CDN and SSL, Interactions and animations with zero JavaScript |
| Am besten für | Design teams that need real-time collaboration and seamless developer handoff | Designers who want to build production websites without developers — and actually ship clean code |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Schwer |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Figma stands out with Real-time collaboration and Auto Layout. Webflow counters with Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control and Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content.
Figma's Achilles heel: requires internet connection — offline mode is limited and the desktop app is basically a browser wrapper. Webflow's: steep learning curve if you do not understand css concepts — it is visual but not simple. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value real-time collaboration and design-teams, die echtzeit-kollaboration und, go with Figma. If designer, die echte websites matters more, Webflow is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.