Evernote vs Logseq — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Evernote, wenn: Leute, die viel Web-Content clippen und eine mächtige Suche über alle ihre Notizen wollen
Wähle Logseq, wenn: Privatsphäre-bewusste Denker, die Roam-artige bidirektionale Verlinkung ohne Abo wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Evernote is easier to pick up, but Logseq is more powerful long-term.
| Evernote | Logseq | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free with 60MB/mo uploads and 1 device | Personal $14.99/mo | Free and open source | Logseq Sync $5/mo (optional cloud sync) |
| Funktionen | Web clipper, Document scanning, Search inside images and PDFs, Task management, Calendar integration | Outliner-based note-taking, Bidirectional linking, Local-first with no vendor lock-in, PDF annotation, Flashcards and spaced repetition |
| Am besten für | People who clip a lot of web content and want powerful search across all their notes | Privacy-conscious thinkers who want Roam-style bidirectional linking without the subscription |
| Lernkurve | Einfach | Schwer |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Evernote stands out with Web clipper and Document scanning. Logseq counters with Outliner-based note-taking and Bidirectional linking.
Evernote's Achilles heel: has been declining for years — frequent price hikes, lost features, and the free plan is now nearly unusable at 1 device. Logseq's: outliner-only format is polarizing — if you want freeform docs like notion, this will frustrate you. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value web clipper and leute, die viel web-content, go with Evernote. If privatsphäre-bewusste denker, die roam-artige matters more, Logseq is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.