Dropbox vs Sync.com — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Dropbox, wenn: Freelancer und kleine Teams, die zuverlässige Datei-Sync, Sharing und große Dateiübertragungen brauchen
Wähle Sync.com, wenn: Privacy-first-Teams, die Zero-Knowledge-Encryption standardmäßig ohne Aufpreis wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Dropbox for simplicity, Sync.com for power users.
| Dropbox | Sync.com | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | 2 GB free | Plus $11.99/mo (2 TB) | 5 GB free | Teams Standard $6/user/mo (1 TB) |
| Funktionen | Smart Sync for disk space management, Paper for collaborative docs, Transfer large files up to 100 GB, Version history (180 days), Third-party app integrations | End-to-end encryption by default, Zero-knowledge privacy, HIPAA and GDPR compliant, File requests and sharing, Vault for archived files |
| Am besten für | Freelancers and small teams who need reliable file sync, sharing, and large file transfers | Privacy-first teams that want zero-knowledge encryption included by default with no extra cost |
| Lernkurve | Einfach | Einfach |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Dropbox stands out with Smart Sync for disk space management and Paper for collaborative docs. Sync.com counters with End-to-end encryption by default and Zero-knowledge privacy.
Dropbox's Achilles heel: only 2 gb free is laughable in 2026 — google gives 15 gb and most competitors give 5–10 gb. Sync.com's: no native document editing — you have to download files, edit locally, and re-sync every time. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value smart sync for disk space management and freelancer und kleine teams,, go with Dropbox. If privacy-first-teams, die zero-knowledge-encryption standardmäßig matters more, Sync.com is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.