ConvertKit vs Sender — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle ConvertKit, wenn: Creator, Blogger und Newsletter-Autoren, die einfache Automation wollen, die einfach funktioniert
Wähle Sender, wenn: Bootstrapped Businesses, die E-Mail plus SMS Automation brauchen, ohne Mailchimp-Preise zu zahlen
Unsere Einschätzung: ConvertKit for simplicity, Sender for power users.
| ConvertKit | Sender | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free up to 10,000 subscribers (limited features) | Creator $25/mo (300 subs) | Free up to 2,500 subscribers and 15,000 emails/mo | Standard $8/mo (2,500 subs) |
| Funktionen | Visual automation builder, Subscriber tagging, Landing pages and forms, Creator Network for growth, Digital product sales | Drag-and-drop email and popup builder, Marketing automation workflows with branching, SMS campaigns alongside email, Heatmap analytics for email engagement, Free tier with no Sender branding on paid plans |
| Am besten für | Creators, bloggers, and newsletter writers who want simple automation that just works | Bootstrapped businesses that need email plus SMS automation without paying Mailchimp prices |
| Lernkurve | Einfach | Einfach |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
ConvertKit stands out with Visual automation builder and Subscriber tagging. Sender counters with Drag-and-drop email and popup builder and Marketing automation workflows with branching.
ConvertKit's Achilles heel: email template design is intentionally minimal — if you want pixel-perfect branded emails, look elsewhere. Sender's: template library is thin and designs feel dated — you will spend time customizing from scratch. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value visual automation builder and creator, blogger und newsletter-autoren,, go with ConvertKit. If bootstrapped businesses, die e-mail matters more, Sender is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.