Constant Contact vs ConvertKit — Wer gewinnt?

Kurzfassung

Wähle Constant Contact, wenn: Lokale Unternehmen und Non-Profits, die einfache E-Mail-Kampagnen mit Telefon-Support wollen

Wähle ConvertKit, wenn: Creator, Blogger und Newsletter-Autoren, die einfache Automation wollen, die einfach funktioniert

Unsere Einschätzung: Constant Contact for simplicity, ConvertKit for power users.

 Constant ContactConvertKit
PreiseNo free plan (60-day trial) | Lite $12/moFree up to 10,000 subscribers (limited features) | Creator $25/mo (300 subs)
FunktionenEmail templates (200+), Social media posting, Event marketing, Surveys and polls, SMS marketing (Premium)Visual automation builder, Subscriber tagging, Landing pages and forms, Creator Network for growth, Digital product sales
Am besten fürLocal businesses and nonprofits that want simple email campaigns with phone supportCreators, bloggers, and newsletter writers who want simple automation that just works
LernkurveEinfachEinfach

Der wahre Unterschied

Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.

Constant Contact stands out with Email templates (200+) and Social media posting. ConvertKit counters with Visual automation builder and Subscriber tagging.

Constant Contact's Achilles heel: automation is basic compared to activecampaign — no conditional logic or advanced branching on lower tiers. ConvertKit's: email template design is intentionally minimal — if you want pixel-perfect branded emails, look elsewhere. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.

Fazit

If you value email templates (200+) and lokale unternehmen und non-profits,, go with Constant Contact. If creator, blogger und newsletter-autoren, matters more, ConvertKit is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Ähnliche Vergleiche