Capacities vs Tana — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Capacities, wenn: Visuelle Denker, die Notions Flexibilität mit einem persönlicheren, objekt-orientierten Wissenssystem wollen
Wähle Tana, wenn: Power-User, die sich ihr eigenes persönliches Betriebssystem mit strukturierten, abfragbaren Notizen bauen wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Capacities for simplicity, Tana for power users.
| Capacities | Tana | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free for personal use | Pro $9.99/mo | Free for personal use | Tana Pro $10/mo |
| Funktionen | Object-based note system, Daily notes and journals, Media management, Tag-based organization, Graph view of connections | Supertag-based schema system, Live search nodes, Command node automations, AI integration built-in, Outliner with structured data |
| Am besten für | Visual thinkers who want Notion’s flexibility with a more personal, object-oriented knowledge system | Power users who want to build their own personal operating system with structured, queryable notes |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Schwer |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Capacities stands out with Object-based note system and Daily notes and journals. Tana counters with Supertag-based schema system and Live search nodes.
Capacities's Achilles heel: young product with missing features — no api, limited integrations, and collaboration is early-stage. Tana's: steep learning cliff — the supertag concept is powerful but takes days to grok properly. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value object-based note system and visuelle denker, die notions, go with Capacities. If power-user, die sich ihr matters more, Tana is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.