Capacities vs Roam Research — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Capacities, wenn: Visuelle Denker, die Notions Flexibilität mit einem persönlicheren, objekt-orientierten Wissenssystem wollen
Wähle Roam Research, wenn: Forscher und Autoren, die in vernetzten Ideen denken und Block-Level-Linking wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Capacities for simplicity, Roam Research for power users.
| Capacities | Roam Research | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free for personal use | Pro $9.99/mo | No free plan | Pro $15/mo |
| Funktionen | Object-based note system, Daily notes and journals, Media management, Tag-based organization, Graph view of connections | Bidirectional linking, Block-level references, Daily notes workflow, Graph overview, Custom CSS and JavaScript |
| Am besten für | Visual thinkers who want Notion’s flexibility with a more personal, object-oriented knowledge system | Researchers and writers who think in connected ideas and want block-level linking |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Schwer |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Capacities stands out with Object-based note system and Media management. Roam Research counters with Bidirectional linking and Block-level references.
Capacities's Achilles heel: young product with missing features — no api, limited integrations, and collaboration is early-stage. Roam Research's: no free plan, web-only (no native desktop), and the community has shrunk as obsidian and logseq grew. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value object-based note system and visuelle denker, die notions, go with Capacities. If forscher und autoren, die matters more, Roam Research is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.