Asana vs Wrike — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Asana, wenn: Mittelgroße Teams, die strukturierte Projekt-Workflows brauchen — ohne Developer-Komplexität
Wähle Wrike, wenn: Enterprise-Teams, die mehrere crossfunktionale Projekte mit hohem Reporting-Bedarf jonglieren
Unsere Einschätzung: Asana for simplicity, Wrike for power users.
| Asana | Wrike | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free for up to 10 users | Starter $10.99/user/mo | Free for up to 5 users | Team $9.80/user/mo |
| Funktionen | Timeline and Gantt views, Workflow automation, Custom fields and forms, Portfolio tracking, 200+ integrations | Gantt charts and workload view, Cross-tagging across projects, Request forms and approvals, Time tracking built-in, 400+ integrations |
| Am besten für | Mid-size teams that need structured project workflows without developer complexity | Enterprise teams juggling multiple cross-functional projects with heavy reporting needs |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Mittel |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Asana stands out with Timeline and Gantt views and Workflow automation. Wrike counters with Cross-tagging across projects and Request forms and approvals.
Asana's Achilles heel: free plan is barebones — you hit paywall fast on reporting and automation. Wrike's: the ui feels dated and cluttered — onboarding new team members takes longer than it should. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value timeline and gantt views and mittelgroße teams, die strukturierte, go with Asana. If enterprise-teams, die mehrere crossfunktionale matters more, Wrike is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.