Asana vs Shortcut — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Asana, wenn: Mittelgroße Teams, die strukturierte Projekt-Workflows brauchen — ohne Developer-Komplexität
Wähle Shortcut, wenn: Software-Teams, die aus Trello rausgewachsen sind, aber Jira erdrückend finden — der Sweet Spot für 10–100 Engineers
Unsere Einschätzung: Asana for simplicity, Shortcut for power users.
| Asana | Shortcut | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free for up to 10 users | Starter $10.99/user/mo | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| Funktionen | Timeline and Gantt views, Workflow automation, Custom fields and forms, Portfolio tracking, 200+ integrations | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams |
| Am besten für | Mid-size teams that need structured project workflows without developer complexity | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Mittel |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Asana stands out with Workflow automation and Custom fields and forms. Shortcut counters with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations.
Asana's Achilles heel: free plan is barebones — you hit paywall fast on reporting and automation. Shortcut's: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value workflow automation and mittelgroße teams, die strukturierte, go with Asana. If software-teams, die aus trello matters more, Shortcut is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.