Asana vs Linear — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Asana, wenn: Mittelgroße Teams, die strukturierte Projekt-Workflows brauchen — ohne Developer-Komplexität
Wähle Linear, wenn: Engineering-Teams, die den schnellsten und konsequentesten Issue Tracker auf dem Markt wollen
Unsere Einschätzung: Asana for simplicity, Linear for power users.
| Asana | Linear | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free for up to 10 users | Starter $10.99/user/mo | Free for up to 250 issues | Standard $8/user/mo |
| Funktionen | Timeline and Gantt views, Workflow automation, Custom fields and forms, Portfolio tracking, 200+ integrations | Keyboard-first navigation, Cycles and roadmaps, Git and PR integrations, Triage and auto-assignment, Sub-issues and relations |
| Am besten für | Mid-size teams that need structured project workflows without developer complexity | Engineering teams that want the fastest, most opinionated issue tracker on the market |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Einfach |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Asana stands out with Timeline and Gantt views and Workflow automation. Linear counters with Keyboard-first navigation and Cycles and roadmaps.
Asana's Achilles heel: free plan is barebones — you hit paywall fast on reporting and automation. Linear's: built for devs by devs — non-technical teams will feel alienated by the workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value timeline and gantt views and mittelgroße teams, die strukturierte, go with Asana. If engineering-teams, die den schnellsten matters more, Linear is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.