Asana vs Height — Wer gewinnt?
Wähle Asana, wenn: Mittelgroße Teams, die strukturierte Projekt-Workflows brauchen — ohne Developer-Komplexität
Wähle Height, wenn: Produkt- und Engineering-Teams, die AI in jede Projektaktion eingebaut haben wollen — nicht nachträglich draufgeschraubt
Unsere Einschätzung: Asana for simplicity, Height for power users.
| Asana | Height | |
|---|---|---|
| Preise | Free for up to 10 users | Starter $10.99/user/mo | Free for unlimited members with basic features | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| Funktionen | Timeline and Gantt views, Workflow automation, Custom fields and forms, Portfolio tracking, 200+ integrations | AI-powered task creation and prioritization, Cross-team project views with filtering, Built-in spreadsheet-like attributes, Smart task suggestions from chat and docs, Real-time collaboration with offline support |
| Am besten für | Mid-size teams that need structured project workflows without developer complexity | Product and engineering teams that want AI baked into every project action — not bolted on |
| Lernkurve | Mittel | Mittel |
Der wahre Unterschied
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Asana stands out with Timeline and Gantt views and Workflow automation. Height counters with AI-powered task creation and prioritization and Cross-team project views with filtering.
Asana's Achilles heel: free plan is barebones — you hit paywall fast on reporting and automation. Height's: young product with a smaller ecosystem — integrations and templates lag behind asana and linear. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
Fazit
If you value timeline and gantt views and mittelgroße teams, die strukturierte, go with Asana. If produkt- und engineering-teams, die matters more, Height is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.