Shortcut مقابل Teamwork — أيهما الأفضل؟
اختر Shortcut إذا: فرق البرمجيات التي تجاوزت Trello لكن تجد Jira خانقاً — النقطة المثالية لـ 10-100 مهندس
اختر Teamwork إذا: الوكالات وفرق خدمة العملاء التي تحتاج تتبع ساعات الفوترة مدمجاً في إدارة المشاريع
رأينا: Shortcut for simplicity, Teamwork for power users.
| Shortcut | Teamwork | |
|---|---|---|
| الأسعار | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo | Free for up to 5 users | Deliver $13.99/user/mo |
| المزايا | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams | Client-facing project views, Time tracking and billing, Workload and profitability reporting, Task dependencies and milestones, Built-in chat |
| الأنسب لـ | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers | Agencies and client services teams that need billable time tracking baked into project management |
| سهولة التعلّم | متوسط | متوسط |
الفرق الحقيقي
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Shortcut stands out with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations. Teamwork counters with Client-facing project views and Workload and profitability reporting.
Shortcut's Achilles heel: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Teamwork's: the interface feels enterprise-heavy for small teams — too many menus for simple projects. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
الخلاصة
If you value kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and فرق البرمجيات التي تجاوزت, go with Shortcut. If الوكالات وفرق خدمة العملاء matters more, Teamwork is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.