Penpot مقابل Webflow — أيهما الأفضل؟
اختر Penpot إذا: أنصار المصدر المفتوح الذين يريدون بديل Figma مستضاف ذاتياً بدون قفل مورّد
اختر Webflow إذا: المصممون الذين يريدون بناء مواقع إنتاجية بدون مطورين — وينشرون كوداً نظيفاً فعلاً
رأينا: Penpot for simplicity, Webflow for power users.
| Penpot | Webflow | |
|---|---|---|
| الأسعار | Free and open source | Penpot Cloud Teams custom pricing | Free with webflow.io subdomain and 2 pages | Basic $14/mo |
| المزايا | Open source and self-hostable, SVG-native design, Real-time collaboration, Components and design systems, Interactive prototyping | Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control, Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content, Responsive design without writing media queries, Native hosting with global CDN and SSL, Interactions and animations with zero JavaScript |
| الأنسب لـ | Open-source advocates who want a self-hosted Figma alternative with no vendor lock-in | Designers who want to build production websites without developers — and actually ship clean code |
| سهولة التعلّم | متوسط | صعب |
الفرق الحقيقي
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Penpot stands out with Open source and self-hostable and SVG-native design. Webflow counters with Visual CSS/HTML builder with full code control and Built-in CMS for blogs, portfolios, and dynamic content.
Penpot's Achilles heel: still catching up to figma on polish and plugin ecosystem — feels rough around the edges. Webflow's: steep learning curve if you do not understand css concepts — it is visual but not simple. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
الخلاصة
If you value open source and self-hostable and أنصار المصدر المفتوح الذين, go with Penpot. If المصممون الذين يريدون بناء matters more, Webflow is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.