Linear مقابل Shortcut — أيهما الأفضل؟
اختر Linear إذا: فرق الهندسة التي تريد أسرع وأقوى أداة تتبع مهام في السوق
اختر Shortcut إذا: فرق البرمجيات التي تجاوزت Trello لكن تجد Jira خانقاً — النقطة المثالية لـ 10-100 مهندس
رأينا: Linear is easier to pick up, but Shortcut is more powerful long-term.
| Linear | Shortcut | |
|---|---|---|
| الأسعار | Free for up to 250 issues | Standard $8/user/mo | Free for up to 10 users | Team $8.50/user/mo |
| المزايا | Keyboard-first navigation, Cycles and roadmaps, Git and PR integrations, Triage and auto-assignment, Sub-issues and relations | Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints, Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations, Docs and wikis inside the project tool, Iteration planning with velocity tracking, Milestones that group epics across teams |
| الأنسب لـ | Engineering teams that want the fastest, most opinionated issue tracker on the market | Software teams that outgrew Trello but find Jira suffocating — the sweet spot for 10-100 engineers |
| سهولة التعلّم | سهل | متوسط |
الفرق الحقيقي
Both offer free tiers, so the real question is what you get when you start paying.
Linear stands out with Keyboard-first navigation and Cycles and roadmaps. Shortcut counters with Kanban and timeline views built for dev sprints and Deep GitHub, GitLab, and Sentry integrations.
Linear's Achilles heel: built for devs by devs — non-technical teams will feel alienated by the workflow assumptions. Shortcut's: non-technical teams struggle with the developer-centric terminology and workflow assumptions. Pick whichever weakness you can live with.
الخلاصة
If you value keyboard-first navigation and فرق الهندسة التي تريد, go with Linear. If فرق البرمجيات التي تجاوزت matters more, Shortcut is your pick. Neither is a bad choice — but one will fit your workflow better.